Erin O’Toole adopts bunker mentality as election spending questions emerge

The brain trust around the Conservative leader is running out of ideas as the drip of leaks surrounding his leadership become harder to ignore

The target on Erin O’Toole’s back just got bigger.

Days after Saskatchewan Senator Denise Batters was bounced for publicly calling for a review of O’Toole’s leadership over the direction he’s taking the party, the Conservative leader is now facing questions over election spending. 

Turns out the party blew a cool million on that television studio set up in an Ottawa hotel for the campaign, according to leaks from Global News.

The expenditure was approved by the Conservative Fund, the fundraising arm of the party – whose chair James Dodds happens to be a longtime O’Toole fundraiser – and the party’s national council. That’s not so scandalous.

But given the election results, some in the party are beginning to question the wisdom of the spending and the decision to keep O’Toole locked up in a studio instead of out getting to know voters.

It may have saved the party a bundle – some $2 million according to their estimates – but it proved a disaster for a relatively newly minted leader who was still acquainting himself with the electorate.

O’Toole defended the campaign strategy on Thursday saying that the party “had to be ready for a pandemic election.” 

But it’s also true that O’Toole’s inner circle was keen to paper over obvious rifts between the leader and the party based on a range of issues from gun control to women’s right to choose, and they needed to control election messaging. Daily press conferences in a half-filled media studio and online “town halls” with handpicked party supporters proved a cluster you-know-what.

O’Toole’s strategists are at it again – true to O’Toole’s military training – and are adopting a bunker mentality to now beat back questions about his leadership. 

The slow drip, drip, drip of embarrassing leaks is becoming harder to ignore. It’s torturous to watch.

Besides the questions about election strategy and spending, Global News also reported this week that O’Toole’s office allegedly used taxpayer funds to purchase some $245,141 in “communications, audio-visual and telecommunications equipment and services” between October 2020 and April 2021. O’Toole’s office has denied any taxpayer dollars were used for “partisan purposes,” as the leader’s opponents step up their assault.

On Thursday, the Conservative party’s communications team released a promotional video featuring some newly elected MPs promising to “fight” for Canadians. 

It’s meant to present a newer face of the party and a united front. But instead of fighting for Canadians, O’Toole has been hunkering down and spending most of his time since the election fighting to keep a lid on a caucus revolt, more recently over mandatory vaccines for MPs.

Last week, he reportedly rehired Ontario Proud and Canada Proud founder Jeff Ballingall – he of fratboy memes and O’Toole’s “True Blue” leadership campaign – to head up what’s being described as “election readiness.” An election is at least two years away but this crew seems intent on continuing to fight the last one.

Ballingall’s hire is not so much about election readiness as it is about keeping caucus rebels in line. It also reeks of desperation. Ballingall was a big promoter of focusing Conservative party efforts on social media during the campaign, particularly on Facebook.

Clearly, it didn’t work during the election. It’s not working now with the party essentially refrying the same old same old in its social media messaging since the election, including trying to drum up fears of a Liberal-NDP coalition to keep the base in check.

The Conservative brain trust around O’Toole is running out of ideas. It’s all becoming a little tiresome. How long can the charade last?


Brand Voices

2 responses to “Erin O’Toole adopts bunker mentality as election spending questions emerge”

  1. Re: “The Conservative party leader may need some divine intervention to save his leadership.” [@erinotoole photo cutline] …

    It seems that when a public person openly fantasizes about world peace, a guaranteed minimum income and/or a clean global environment, many conservative ‘Christians’ reactively presume that person must therefore be Godless thus evil or, far worse, a socialist. This, despite a big chunk of Christ’s own teachings epitomizing the primary component of socialism — do not hoard morbidly superfluous wealth in the midst of poverty.

    Just the concept of socialists having any power anywhere on the planet likely causes distress to most Republicans. Some may become so narrow-mindedly enraged by it, they, with their tightened fist trembling before them, will utter: ‘I would vote for the devil himself if that’s what it took to keep those Godless socialists out of office!’

    Over decades, I’ve found that too many monotheists have unwittingly created God’s nature in their own characteristically fallible and angry, vengeful image.

  2. Totally True… But hey .. A Social Democrat is thrown into being a socialist.. How about ..
    The CON.. serve .. atives .. Conning you to Serve.. I wouldn’t call them Christians …They are Dominionests. 31yr free trade with China
    (Stephen Harper) .. CON serve atives
    Conning You to Serve !!! Man is head of the household!!! Everything belongs to man! Sad
    Jesus, was about Love . The Highest vibration
    All you need is Love changed the world forever. So tomorrow at 8 am sing
    All you need is Love.. Luv
    Imagine the world in song..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOW Magazine