The Ford government plans to scrap speed cameras across the province, arguing the devices have become more about revenue than road safety. But Ontarians are pushing back, saying the cameras save lives and keep pedestrians safe.
The premier confirmed in a press release on Thursday that legislation is expected next month, and if passed, the ban would take effect immediately.
In lieu of speed cameras, the province will create a new fund to help municipalities implement traffic-calming measures such as speed bumps, raised crosswalks, curb extensions, and roundabouts, alongside education campaigns and enhanced signage.
Ford argued the change is about fairness and affordability in a post on X on Thursday, adding that municipalities have turned speed cameras into a “cash grab.”
Today, I announced that we’re banning municipal speed cameras in Ontario to stop the cash grab from drivers and taxpayers.
— Doug Ford (@fordnation) September 25, 2025
Instead, we’re investing in new traffic-calming measures like signs and roundabouts that will stop people from speeding in the first place.
Find out more:… pic.twitter.com/LOyAqiw2G0
He emphasized that drivers shouldn’t be hit with tickets weeks after the fact and framed the new fund as a better way to prevent speeding before it happens.
Ford said in the release that the province’s focus will be on proactive measures that both keep costs down and make Ontario’s roads safer.
HOW DO ONTARIANS FEEL ABOUT SPEED CAMERAS?
Not everyone agrees with the province’s approach. Online reaction was swift, with some calling the decision short-sighted.
“How ridiculous is this? It changes behavior, slows traffic in high-risk areas, penalizes speeders, adds revenue, saves lives and makes policing more efficient. Only downside is it doesn’t get votes,” one user wrote on X.
“Don’t you do this! The streets are already too unsafe for pedestrians,” another person warned.
“If we’re going to lift this ban, why not go further and remove speed limits or legalize drinking and driving as well? Public opposition exists for good reason. This decision appears to be more about appeasing frustration than responsible governance. Stupid decision,” another user said.
A user even questioned whether the matter could even be challenged in court.
“It seems like there are lots of studies showing speed cameras make roads safer. Therefore, removing them would make those areas more dangerous,” one commenter said.
