Advertisement

Your City

Alarming deepfake pornographic images of Taylor Swift have people online calling for a crackdown

Taylor Swift
On Wednesday, images of sexually explicit AI-generated images of pop star Taylor Swift circulated on X (formerly known as Twitter) and caused outrage among ‘swifties’. (Courtesy: Taylor Swift /Instagram)

Outraged Taylor Swift fans are calling for stiffer consequences after x-rated AI images spread online.

On Wednesday, images of sexually explicit AI-generated images of pop star Taylor Swift circulated on X (formerly known as Twitter) and caused outrage among ‘swifties’. 

According to CBC, a photo shared by a user was seen more than 45 million times before the account was suspended. 

It sparked many people online questioning what are the consequences for sexually explicit AI-generated images.

Now Toronto contacted Toronto Police Service asking if there are any laws prohibiting these actions.

“In general, reports involving the non-consensual distribution of intimate images of an adult are reviewed on a case-by-case basis in collaboration with the Crown’s office,” a police spokesperson said.

Advertisement

We also contacted Ryan Handlarski who’s a criminal defence lawyer at RH Criminal Defence who confirmed there are legal consequences for people who create such explicit content.

“It is a criminal offence to publish or distribute an intimate image without a person’s consent,” Handlarski revealed. 

“In my view, altering an image using AI to make it nude or pornographic and publishing it could easily lead to a criminal charge contrary to section 162.1 (1) of the Criminal Code,” Handlarski added. 

Amid the backlash from online users calling for a crackdown, X’s safety team said in a post, “Our teams are actively removing all identified images and taking appropriate actions against the accounts response for posting them.” 

According to section 162.1 (1) of the Criminal Code, Everyone who knowingly publishes, distributes, transmits, sells, makes available or advertise an intimate of a person knowing that the person depicted in the image did not give their consent to that conduct, or being reckless as to whether or not that person gave their consent to that conduct, is guilty.”

Advertisement

Handlarski also said the maximum sentence in Canada after being convicted of this offence is five years. 

Advertisement

Exclusive content and events straight to your inbox

Subscribe to our Newsletter

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By signing up, I agree to receive emails from Now Toronto and to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Recently Posted